A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among prospective neighbours around the construction of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier plus the Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has developed into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, search for to make their family members house. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, particularly in the delicate coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which can be partly built, is in the correct place. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, in which sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the intensity from the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Adult men entered the h2o through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site turned one of the most putting descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant in the lawful timeline.
Within the core of your dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as made, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their action is motivated by concern for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed according to Specialist information and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Occasions post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Rene Collier and Paul Feely Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly diverse Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Are living together with each other long once the authorized expenses have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. No matter if it'll eventually be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.